… says look to the future rather than pastDespite repeated calls by several Caribbean territories to be paid reparations by European nations for their involvement and benefit from slavery, the United Kingdom (UK) believes that such calls are not the way forward. The calls are for financial compensation to be paid to descendants of enslaved peoples but the UK, Guyana’s former colonial ruler, indicated that countries should look to the future rather than the past.UK High Commissioner to Guyana, Greg QuinnThis was the expressed view of British High Commissioner to Guyana, Greg Quinn who told media operatives that his country is maintaining its position regarding the reparation calls.“We as a Government do not believe that reparations are the way forward and that we need to look to the future and not the past. I know Caricom Reparations Committee has been looking on this but I’m not quite sure what the status is of what they may have produced and whether they would have made that claim or request to the UK,” the Ambassador explained.For over 400 years, colonial European powers benefited from slavery. The trade brought over 10 million captured Africans to work in sugar and cotton plantations throughout the Caribbean and the Americas. Governments in the Caribbean have estimated that reparations for the slave trade could be trillions of dollars, and some have floated the idea of debt relief.Caribbean leaders in 2014 had approved a 10-point plan to seek reparations from the former slave-owning states of Europe. In July 2017, Guyanese President David Granger suggested that more awareness and education was needed to allow for support in calls for reparative justice.“Reparative justice is not a ruse for development finance or international handouts. It is a demand aimed at ensuring recompense for crimes against humanity, enslavement and native genocide, and for the atrocities of indentured immigration. The demand for ‘reparative justice’ must not be confused with developmental assistance,” the President stated at the National Rastafarian Conference earlier this year.Ambassador Quinn recalled that it was his country’s past Prime Minister, David Cameron, who had suggested that reparations were not the way forward.“Look back at what Prime Minister Cameron said when he was in Jamaica in September 2015 and that is still the position,” Ambassador Quinn maintained.When Cameron had visited that Caribbean island, Jamaica’s then Prime Minister Portia Simpson-Miller reiterated calls for reparations to be paid by Britain but on a sidelines interview, the former UK Prime Minister had responded in the negative.“I don’t think reparations are the right answer but the purpose of my visit is to look to the future,” the former Prime Minister, who later resigned in 2016, had stated.Some 46,000 British slave owners, including a distant relative of former Prime Minister Cameron, and distance relatives of UK television and film actor, Benedict Cumberbatch, were among those compensated at a current-day equivalent of £17 billion for “loss of human property” after the country emancipated its slaves in 1833.Britain subsequently replaced slavery with indentureship, offering immigrant workers small payments and marginally better living conditions. (Shemuel Fanfair)
CEO of Stitch WiseWhy is Natalie a Social Innovator?Natalie grew up in the mining town of Carletonville, but knew nothing about the tough working conditions underground, or the many workers who are permanently disabled because of mining accidents.When she did find out how serious the problem was, she decided she had to do something about it. But what?Having no previous experience in the mines, Natalie did what any driven social entrepreneur would do – experience the environment first-hand. For the next 18 months, Natalie spent eight hours underground researching the safety conditions of the miners.She then started Stitch Wise – a business that employs paraplegics injured on the mines to create innovative products that dramatically enhance safety in the mines.In her own words.“What most businesses don’t realise is that you just need to make a few changes to be able to employ disabled people, and through that process you can harness a huge pool of skills and opportunities for your business.”Fast FactsNatalie and her husband Tim started Stitch Wise with R1. Eleven years later, Stitch Wise generates around R25-million in annual revenues.Stitch Wise supplies 12 000 backfill bags a year to the mining industry and produces cutting-edge rainwear, knee and arm guards.Stitch Wise sets the industry standard in geo-textiles, and has captured 50% of the backfill market in South Africa.The firm employs 128 workers, 50% of whom are differently-abled.Recognition that their staff are not disabled but differently-abled is paramount to Stitch Wise’s philosophy.Great pride is taken in the company’s empowerment programmes, as well as training, social upliftment and contribution to the development of South Africa’s economy.Natalie has received numerous nominations and prestigious awards, most recently a nomination for the Schwab Foundation Award.How can I learn more?To learn more about Natalie and her amazing team, visit Stitch Wise.Contact Stitch WiseTel: 018 788 2622 / 5385Fax: 018 786 3871E-mail: [email protected] first published on SAinfo on 25 April 2008.Source: Brand South Africa
Give your video projects a pro color treatment with Looks 2.0! Enter to win a copy – a $399 value!UPDATE: THE CONTEST HAS NOW ENDED. Thanks to all who entered.Please follow us on Twitter and Facebook for info on future giveaways!Premiumbeat.com teamed up with Red Giant Software, to give away a copy of Magic Bullet Looks 2.0, a full featured color correction suite!ABOUT MAGIC BULLET LOOKS 2.0Give your film or video project a unique style with Looks 2.0‘s powerful color correction and grading tools. With an improved user interface and color correction features, Looks 2.0 offers grading tools above and beyond those in your current non-linear video editing application. Choose from over 100 unique color looks to add instant flair to your project or create a style that’s all your own Looks’ professional color correction tools like the 3-way color corrector, contrast ‘Pop’ and Ranged HSL (to fine tune a particular color in the frame).In addition, Red Giant Looks 2.0 includes a ‘Cosmo’ a tool for smoothing out skin tones and cleaning up blemishes – a quick trick for shedding years off your on-screen talent.Whether your project is SD or 4K+, Looks can process any resolution. External monitor preview is now supported, so you can grade on a reference display. The Looks 2.0 effects interface integrates with the majority of professional video editing applications:Adobe After Effects & Premiere ProApple Final Cut Pro X, Final Cut Pro & MotionSony Vegas ProAvid Media ComposerWhether you’re just looking to clean up the color in a corporate interview or you’re grading an entire feature film, Looks 2.0 has got you covered.Check out Red Giant’s Plot Device, a film that uses multiple Looks 2.0 presets for color grading:ABOUT RED GIANT SOFTWAREFor the last 10 years, Red Giant has been on the forefront of effects for film, television and web video. From broadcast design to color correction, their product line consists of over 60 professional effects prod cuts. You’ve likely seen feature films that utilized Red Giant effects – The Social Network, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Angels & Demons, among dozens of others. Big thanks to Red Giant for sponsoring this giveaway!
Paul Barnsley APTN InvestigatesThe source of an April 2016 Globe and Mail report outlining a mistake by federal government lawyers which allowed the Catholic Church to escape paying $21 million in obligations to the Residential School Settlement Agreement, now says that number is actually millions of dollars higher.Ron Kidd, of Vancouver, said that of the $54 million various Catholic Church entities had agreed to pay, $37,875,660 has not been paid.Kidd is a former provincial tax auditor, self-appointed church watchdog, and gay rights activist. He has a history of successfully leading anti-discrimination cases that trace back to the early 1990s.He claims to have been instrumental in leading Globe reporters to the original story and then working closely with NDP MP Charlie Angus’ staff to put detailed questions to the government to access more information about the Church’s obligations.“It was triggered by specific events, which is that in 1981 and 1986, the Catholic Church led the opposition to amend Ontario’s Human Rights Act to include gay people on the basis that we were a threat to family values. And I felt that if you really believe that human rights is sacred and divine, the church would be in favour of equality for gay people.”After getting a Certified General Accountant designation in 1990, Kidd worked for the British Columbia government for more than a decade as a tax auditor.He says the paper trail is clear.“I’m being very careful to try to show you in all cases where I got the information. It isn’t a matter that an accountant is saying that the numbers are such and such,” he said.(Ron Kidd) In all, the 50 Catholic Entities who were parties to the settlement agreement committed to pay $54 million. Twenty-nine million was to go “in-kind” contributions to the Aboriginal Healing Foundation. An additional $25 million was to go to “best efforts” fundraising. All of the money was intended to pay for programs that would help residential school survivors.Most legal dictionaries refer to “in kind” payments as those that are made through providing “goods, commodities or services” rather than cash.Lawyers differ on what the term “best efforts” means. Some say it’s a higher standard than making a “reasonable effort” to keep a commitment, others say a reasonable effort that can stop short of putting yourself at risk of bankruptcy is sufficient to be able to say you made your best effort.The church entities committed to making their best effort to raise the $25 million but argued that despite those efforts, they did not succeed.Best efforts campaign came up “woefully short” “[Survivors] were supposed to get $25 million, and they got only one million,” Kidd said, adding he questions whether the entities made their best efforts“The Protestant churches were busy fundraising aggressively because the Protestant churches all met their requirements. So from the government’s point of view, the money was coming in from the Protestants, but not the Catholics,” he said.MP Charlie Angus had one staff member working more or less full time on residential schools issues up until last year before Angus began his NDP leadership run. Working with that staff member and the MP, Kidd came up with very detailed written questions to the government in May of 2016.Given the title Q-2052, the question asked the government, among other things: “(i) how much of the $29 million in cash donations owed was given to the survivors, (ii) how much of the $25 million dollars that was supposed to be fundraised, was fundraised, and of that money how much was donated to the survivors, (iii) what was the line by line account for the $25 million of in kind donations, (iv) how much of the total compensation owed was not distributed to survivors, as it was considered an expense, legal cost, or administrative fee of the church, (v) did government lawyers negotiate with other churches in order to waive their legal obligations, and, if so, when did these negotiations occur?”When the government answered several months later, as required by Parliamentary rules, Kidd said he was not impressed.“I was extremely dissatisfied. The question was something to do with how much of the $29 million was payable to the victims and the answer was, it was never payable to the victims. It was payable to the Aboriginal Healing Foundation,” he said.He did not consider that a completely truthful response.“Just by changing the word from ‘paid’ to the Aboriginal Healing Foundation to ‘payable’ to the Aboriginal Healing Foundation, the answer became technically correct, but misleading,” he said.The government response did not include the requested detailed accounting of how the entities’ in kind commitment was fulfilled, so Kidd started combing public records.Many of the organizations involved are licensed charities and must disclose certain financial information to maintain their charitable status.“That money was paid on Jan. 11, 2016. And it appears on their 2016 audited financial statements. So I’m looking, to the best of my knowledge, he said, “The Catholic Entities paid $16,124, 340.”Some of the money originally committed was forgiven by the federal government because the church had already paid some money out in lawsuits it had lost. As the Globe originally reported, a March 2016 letter to Kidd from an Indigenous Affairs assistant deputy minister explained that “miscommunications” between government lawyers allowed the church to escape paying its commitment in total.“Although the Globe and Mail correctly reported that the results of the court case was that the Catholic Church was let off the hook for $21 million dollars. This statement tells you that there was an additional reduction to account for payments already made in separate lawsuits,” Kidd said.According to Kidd, The settlement agreement was a court-supervised agreement that was approved by Parliament.Justice Warren Winkler, the judge who ratified the agreement, warned that the federal government was in the unique position of administering an out-of-court settlement in which it had been a defendant and needed to take extreme steps to be open and transparent.“So how can the Catholic Church and the minister of Indigenous and Northern Affairs do an agreement that reduces it? That’s the first thing, is the legality of it. If they’re really going to do that, they should have brought it to the attention of parliament,” Kidd asked.The best efforts campaign came up woefully short.APTN Investigates asked the government to comment on Kidd’s allegations. Rather than providing a departmental official to answer questions, the then Indigenous Affairs department provided a statement.“The settlement agreement required the Catholic Entities to pay $29 million in a cash contribution. Included in this amount was $8.4 million for Indian residential schools abuse claim compensation, which the Catholic Entities paid prior to the settlement agreement,” the statement reads. “The remaining cash contribution was divided among the Aboriginal Healing Foundation [AHF], the Legacy of Hope, the Returning to Spirit charitable organization, and the Catholic Entities’ administrative costs.“The Catholic Entities paid a total of $14.9 million to the AHF. Canada took the Catholic Entities to court over the remaining $1.6 million, which resulted in the Catholic Entities satisfying their remaining financial obligations with a $1.2 million payment to the Legacy of Hope Foundation (as the AHF had ceased operations by that point).”“In this case, the Saskatchewan supervising court determined that the Catholic Entities had met their financial obligations under the agreement.”Gérard Pettipas, the current archbishop of the Archdiocese of Grouard-McLennan in Alberta did not dispute that the entities had come up short. He was president of the group of 50 Catholic Entities up to the point where the court declared the entities had met their financial obligations.“I know all too well the shortfall of the best effort campaign to raise $25 million. I don’t where he gets this other amount,” Pettipas said.He was not able to respond in detail to Kidd’s questions or allegations.“With the termination of the [Truth and Reconciliation Commission] as a commission and with the satisfaction of our obligations, I’ve not been on top of this other than that we made provisions to stay involved because the IAP is still ongoing. So we have a lawyer to stay on top of that,” he said during an interview. “It would take a bit of research for me. It wouldn’t be in my own files.”He explained that the entities originally approached the $25 million fundraising campaign in the same way hospitals or universities fundraise for major projects like new buildings. They hired a company that specializes in those kinds of projects, in this case Toronto-based Ketchum Canada, Inc. (KCI), to run the Moving Forward Together campaign.When the donations did not meet expectations, the cost of paying KCI was consuming most of the money.“We realized as we went through that process that we were not seeing the return. The money we were taking in, little that it was, we ended up spending that on the firm,” the arch-bishop said.Pettipas was asked about the perception amongst many First Nation observers that the Catholic Church was the most reluctant of all the churches when it came to making good on residential schools abuses.“I know,” he said sadly.Asked if he disputed that observation, he qualified his response by saying it was a “personal perception” and that he was not speaking for the church.“No, a lot of what is said about the residential schools, I would say we recognize it was an idea that had gone awry. I believe that when it was entered into it was perceived to be a good idea. This was going educate Indigenous children,” he said.He revealed the long and complex relationship between the church and the federal government with his next remarks and provided a glimpse into some of the reasoning behind the church’s stand in court on residential schools.“I think the Catholic Church and the other churches were into education before treaty. We were already in missions. We had set up schools. Because this is what Christian churches do. We’re into education and healthcare. So you look at education across Canada and really around the world, a lot of it is initiated by Christian churches, he said. “In signing treaty, the federal government was taking on the responsibility to educate the children. And I think the government saw this as a very convenient way to satisfy that agreement – this treaty commitment. And for the churches I think they saw it as a way of being funded to do what they were already doing anyway. I think we got into it thinking this would always be a good thing.”But government gradually took on a bigger role, he said. How big a role has been an area of disagreement in court about liability since the days before the settlement agreement was signed.He acknowledged that past attitudes towards Indigenous peoples were not as enlightened as they could be.“I’m not sure we were as sensitive in generations past about culture as we are now. I think the TRC reports and recommendations have raised it as never before for Canada – even after the Royal Commission on Aboriginal peoples – I don’t think there was the same concern and interest and commitment on the part of people that we have now.”He responded to the allegation that other churches have been more willing to step up and take responsibility by talking about the corporate structure of his own church.“Some of the struggles in the Catholic circles is due to our structure which is very different from the Protestant churches. We didn’t have one entity. There’s no such thing as the Catholic Church in Canada. Even some of our own people find that hard to understand but it’s true,” he said. “The Catholic Church is not a monolith. It’s made up of many dioceses. And so in terms of coming together and putting forth a common voice, a common reaction, it’s not easy to do that because we’re all different. Even when I was president of the Catholic Entities, I was very aware that not every diocese, not every religious order did I represent. There were 50 Catholic entities that were part of my organization but that’s not near the number of Catholic Entities in Canada.”“There were 50 Catholic entities that were part of my organization but that’s not near the number of Catholic Entities in Canada.”Asked if the low donation rate to the best efforts campaign revealed anything about the attitudes of Catholics towards Indigenous people, Pettipas acknowledged there is still work to do.“The entities that I represented, we were onside. We tried to do what we could to make this happen. I do regret that the campaign brought in so little,” he said. “When finally this story hit the Globe and Mail, I got some interesting letters from people. There were people who were truly embarrassed by our poor showing. This one priest sent me $1,000 out of his own pocket saying ‘I am just so ashamed that we did so poorly on this.’”He said others made local donations rather than to the campaign, which affected the final numbers, but admitted there was resentment in many quarters.“I have heard people say, ‘Well they’re getting all this money from this settlement agreement, why should I give to this?’ One of the things I had to point out to people time and time again is that the monies that we give – the monies that the church was committed to – was not compensation. The government handled compensation. None of our money went to former students. Our money was all for programs for healing and reconciliation,” he said. “Originally, that $29 million was mostly destined for the Aboriginal Healing Foundation. The in kind services was for services to Indigenous communities. The [local] chief had to sign off on each one of those, that he and his council felt this service was beneficial to our community.”But there was one other reason which admitted with regret.“There is still in Canadian society a certain suspicion when it comes to our Indigenous people and money, that somehow this is going to go to them and it will be wasted . . . blah, blah, blah. I’m sure you’ve heard it. We’ve all heard it.”Kidd said he will not give up and will pursue the matter. He criticized the federal government and the Assembly of First Nations, who he says did not respond to his requests for help in getting [email protected]